| Eligibility |
Original, unpublished research |
Original, unpublished research |
Original clinical innovation, technique, educational method, or research application |
| Presenter |
Registered conference delegate. Name of the college and supervisor must not be revealed |
Registered conference delegate. Name of the college and supervisor must not be revealed |
Registered conference delegate. Name of the college and supervisor must not be revealed |
| Participants |
1 or 2 students |
2–5 students per team |
Only 2 teams per college. Maximum 5 students only in a team |
| Presentation Format |
PowerPoint presentation |
E-poster |
Table display with poster/models/digital media |
| Duration |
6-minutes presentation + 2-minutes discussion |
3 minutes presentation + 2 minutes for discussion |
Demonstration during designated evaluation session |
| Content |
Introduction, Objectives, Methodology, Results, Discussion, Conclusion |
Introduction, Objectives, Methodology, Results, Discussion, Conclusion |
Scientific rationale, methodology, clinical application, innovation, and outcomes |
| Ethics |
IEC/AEC approval (where applicable); disclose funding and conflicts of interest |
IEC/AEC approval (where applicable); disclose funding and conflicts of interest |
IEC/AEC approval (where applicable); disclose funding and conflicts of interest |
| Visual Requirements |
PowerPoint (16:9 widescreen) |
Clear text, high-quality figures, tables, and graphs. One page only |
Models, typodonts, photographs, videos, prototypes, digital displays (no live patients) |
| Presenter’s Responsibility |
Upload presentation before the session and report 15 minutes early for the presentation |
Presenter to be available during the judging in their designated areas |
Set up display before the session; remain at the table during evaluation |
| Evaluation Criteria |
Originality, scientific merit, methodology, results, presentation quality, discussion, and ability to answer questions |
Originality, scientific merit, methodology, results, presentation quality, discussion, and ability to answer questions |
Scientific merit, originality, innovation, clinical relevance, educational value, demonstration quality, and communication |
| Awards |
Best Oral Presentation |
Best Poster Presentation |
Best Table Clinic |